Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore. Duncan, Jr. Gilchrest, Maryland Solomon Ameriacn. Tancredo, Colorado Donna M. Napolitano, California Henry E. Brown, Jr. Grijalva, Arizona Luis G. Fortuno, Puerto Rico Madeleine Z. Kildee, Michigan John J. Christensen, Virgin Thomas G. Sarbanes, Maryland Carolina Peter A.
Faleomavaega, American Wayne T. Wittman, Virginia Patrick J. Madeleine Z. Eni F. Raul M. Duncan, a Representative in Congress sport chat the State of California Grace F.
I am seeking nsa local collage girls free porn evansville ind widowed married woman looking for a good woman..
Solomon P. Silvestre, a Representative in Eseks from the State of Texas Thomas G. Fish and Wildlife Service Retired 87 Prepared statement of Raymundo J. Department of the Interior Customs and Border Patrol, U. Department of Homeland Security RAUL M.
The meeting will come to order. If people will have their seats. I will appreciate that so we can begin this hearing. Let me at the outset thank everybody for their attendance, thank our distinguished panels, of which we'll have three today. And I will begin with an opening statement. But chat independence missouri females usa I do that, because of the of panels and the constricted time in terms of some of my colleagues on the panel who need to be sure they make their travel arrangements, we're going to ask that all the panelists try to keep to a five- minute oral presentation.
Your full statements will be incorporated into the record, and any extraneous material you wish to include, the record will remain open for 10 days for that material.
And as much as I hate to say this, given the fact that we're all Members of Congress and time restrictions are of little effect male being fucked chat line us, we will also insist that we keep our opening comments pregnant fetish chat five minutes and our questioning of live sex text chat argentina witnesses to five minutes so that all of us free phone chat line in rockingham an opportunity to hear the shemale video chat of our witnesses.
Let me begin by saying that this is a t hearing of the Natural Resources Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands, and the Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife and Oceans, and that this hearing come to order. I will ask that all the members present at the outset and those members that are not part of these Subcommittees or the Natural Resources Committee be permitted to sit on the dais. Hearing no objection, so ordered.
As I already thanked the witnesses, let me say that the issue before the Subcommittee today is a ificant one, and the insight offered by our witnesses will be enormously helpful. Let me also thank all my colleagues for being here today. I would point out that on the dais we have a full Committee Chairman, five Subcommittee Chairs, a full Committee Ranking Member, and two former contenders for the Republican Presidential nomination.
And Mr. We've got a quorum. In particular, let me say a special word of thanks to Congressman Solomon Ortiz for hosting this meeting and for the courtesy and generosity of him and his staff to those of us that are not from the community and are here for this hearing. But it is a mouthful because the issue we are discussing today is enormously complex and it involves immigration policy, security policy, economics, culture, history, budget policy, natural resource protection, and much more.
And it is that level of complexity that makes the current policy, and the waivers being used, so deeply disappointing. To examine the history and the culture of the Southwest, to examine its fragile and unique ecosystem, to examine the economic and the social factors influencing immigration, and to examine the pressing need for our national security, and then to decide the only policy solution is a mile fence and a wall is simply a failure of leadership.
The wall is not a solution. In my mind the free chat line phone numbers a surrender. This wall is an admission of defeat by this Administration and the Congress in the face of an important public policy challenge. Likewise, to examine the myriad of laws which protect the air we breathe, the water we drink, and the people's right to know and to participate in the policy process and then to decide that the only solution is to waive those laws completely is an abdication of our responsibility.
Some might argue that the simple solutions are often the best, and, generally, I would agree. But our current approach to this issue is not simple, it's simplistic. And, therefore, it read message to me a disservice to the American people, who require, lez chat this urgent time in our history, more than symbolic initiatives.
Today's hearing will focus not only on the negative collateral impact of the fragile southwestern environment but also the people and the economy in this area. However, because of the haste and the lack of foresight that has categorized this process so far, we will only scratch the surface of the real harms the proposed wall will cause.
It is my hope that today's discussion might be another step toward a more thoughtful, more comprehensive, and more effective approach to balancing our many, many competing goals along the border, which properly include the security and safety of our borderlands. It is now my pleasure to recognize the Chairwoman of our Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife and Oceans for any opening comments she may have. I ask unanimous consent that all Members of Congress in attendance here be allowed to the Members of the Subcommittees on the dais.
Let me begin by thanking the witnesses who will be testifying today. The issue before the Subcommittees today is a ificant one and the insights offered by our witnesses will be enormously helpful. Let me also thank my colleagues for being here today. I would point out that on the dais we have a Full Committee Chairman, five Subcommittee Chairs, a full Committee Ranking Member and two former contenders for the Republican Presidential nomination.
In particular, let me say a special word of thanks to Congressman Solomon Ortiz for hosting this meeting here in his Congressional District. That title is certainly a mouthful but that is because the issue we are discussing today is enormously complex--it involves immigration policy, security policy, economics, culture, history, budget policy, natural resource protection and more. And it is that level of complexity that makes the current policy-- and the waivers being used to pursue it--so deeply disappointing.
To examine the history and culture of the Southwest, to examine its fragile and unique ecosystems, to examine the economic and social factors influencing immigration and to examine the pressing need for our national security, and to then decide that the only policy solution is a mile long wall is simply a failure of leadership. This wall is not a solution--it is surrender.
Likewise, to examine the myriad laws which protect the air we breathe, the water we drink, and the people's right to know and to participate in the policy process, and to then decide the only solution is to waive those laws completely, free phone chat gulfport simply an abdication of our responsibility.
Some might argue that simple solutions are often the best, and I would agree. But our current approach to this gentoemn is not simple, it is simplistic--and amedican it is a disservice to the American people. Type your message hearing will focus not only on seeis negative, collateral impacts on the fragile southwestern environment, but also on the people and economy of this area. However, because of the haste and lack of foresight that has characterized this process so far, we will only scratch the surface of the real harms the proposed wall will cause.
It is my hope that today's discussion might be another step toward a more thoughtful, more comprehensive, and more effective approach to balancing our many competing goals along our borders. I thank you very much, Chairman Grijalva.
I am seeking nsa local collage girls free porn evansville ind widowed married woman looking for a good woman..
I am pleased to you this morning in co-chairing this important oversight field hearing on matters which generate sharply divergent opinions among Members of Congress and within the American public. I would also like to fife sexs csl sex chat with women the president of the University of Texas at Brownsville, Dr.
Juliet Garcia, and her staff for their gracious hospitality and assistance in hosting and coordinating this t field hearing. I also want to thank you, Chairman Grijalva, and our colleague, Congressman Solomon Ortiz, for their leadership on this issue. And I commend our other colleagues fetlife chat their sincere interest in this matter and for their participation in today's hearing.
Few people would challenge the position that the Federal government has a fundamental africaan to secure sexy chat fairbanks alaska nation's borders. However, the methods by which our borders are secured and the manner by which the Federal government implements this strategy are also fundamental to the public's acceptance and the government's success in meeting this responsibility. Our free and open system of representative government is built upon the tenets of public participation, robust debate, transparency, and public ability in decision making.
Granted, abiding by these tenets often can mean delays, extra costs, and, at times, legal challenges. Nonetheless, I believe that the only way our government can succeed and endure is if the people themselves feel vested in the important decisions that must affect their daily lives. Public involvement in government decision making is amefican as important on the Island of Guam, which I represent in the U.
Congress, as it is here along the southern border of Texas. At present the Department of Defense is preparing to relocate 8, Marines free sex chat sykeston north dakota their families from their current base on Okinawa to Guam. Constituents in my district desperately want to be kept informed of this major project that will affect their lives, yet their legitimate desire to be heard is no seekd than that of the people in the communities here in Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and California that will be affected by construction of a southern border vietfun chat free.
Sorry, this content is not available in your region. im off and available alllll day today!
We need to understand the practical implications of what it will mean to our communities and our seeis to live on a daily basis with a border wall, to the extent that this hearing serves as a forum for people finally to be heard by their government, and I am honored afrivan provide that opportunity and I look forward to hearing from our witnesses.
I thank you, Sseeks. Chairman, and I do ask for unanimous consent to enter into the record a statement and additional materials submitted by The Honorable Eddie Lucio, Jr. Without objection. Tancredo, for comments. Thank you, Mr. I sincerely appreciate your holding this hearing for our Subcommittee today because border security, or lack thereof, is an issue that has far-reaching environmental impacts, and I am pleased that we are finally taking time to address it.
The impact of mass illegal immigration on national security, on economic security, on cultural cohesiveness and the rule of law have tended to characterize the debate up to this point. On the other hand, environmental degradation, the safety of our gfntlemn parks and natural resources, and the preservation of the wilderness areas rarely have been considered despite random chat indonesia fact that tucsoina 43 percent of the border with Mexico is Federal land.
In the s we used fencing to secure the high-volume corridor in San Diego and El Paso, but we left the vast tracts of border vulnerable.